*
Deadline looms for exclusive talks to sell 43 CK Hutchison ( CKHUF )
ports
*
Ports deal talks include two along Panama Canal
*
Sunday deadline likely to be extended, sources say
*
Deal has become increasingly politicised amid US-China
trade war
(Adds White House official's comment in paragraphs 17-18)
By Clare Jim, Scott Murdoch and Davide Barbuscia
HONG KONG, July 25 (Reuters) - CK Hutchison's ( CKHUF )
plan to sell most of its $22.8 billion ports business is
unlikely to be finalised anytime soon, with political
brinkmanship set to continue, and sources saying that a Sunday
deadline for exclusive talks was likely to be extended.
The Hong Kong conglomerate's plan to sell the business,
which would include two ports along the strategically important
Panama Canal, to a consortium led by BlackRock ( BLK ) and
Italian billionaire Gianluigi Aponte's family-run shipping
company MSC, has become politicised amid an escalating
China-U.S. trade war.
Negotiations for the deal, which covers 43 ports in 23
countries, are on an exclusive basis between CK Hutchison ( CKHUF ),
controlled by Hong Kong tycoon Li Ka-shing, and the consortium
for 145 days until Sunday, according to the terms announced in
March.
The deal talks, however, are unlikely to collapse if the two
parties do not ink a pact by Sunday, with three people close to
the ports-to-telecoms conglomerate saying the parties could
extend the deadline to continue exclusive negotiations.
The first part of the deal - definitive documentation to
sell two port operations near the Panama Canal - was also not
signed by an April 2 deadline set in the sales announcement.
The people declined to be named due to the sensitivity of
the matter.
BlackRock ( BLK ) declined to comment. CK Hutchison ( CKHUF ) and MSC
Mediterranean Shipping Company, which CK Hutchison ( CKHUF ) said in May
was the main investor in the consortium, did not respond to
requests for comment.
U.S. President Donald Trump hailed the deal as "reclaiming"
the Panama Canal, after his administration previously called for
the removal of what it said was Chinese ownership of the ports
near the canal.
But in April, China's top market regulator said that it was
paying close attention to CK Hutchison's ( CKHUF ) planned sale and that
parties to the deal should not try to avoid an antitrust review.
Beijing's stance on the planned deal was made public after
pro-China media launched a stinging criticism, saying China had
significant national interests in the transaction and it would
be a betrayal of the country.
"I think at this moment it's not very optimistic that they
can directly sell the ports to the consortium," said Jackson
Chan, global fixed income senior manager at FSMOne Hong Kong,
which has clients holding CK Hutchison ( CKHUF ) bonds.
"The market has already digested the news, even if it
announces next week that it won't sell anymore, I don't think
it'll be a shock because the market understands it wouldn't have
a large impact on its operations."
DEAL RISKS
CK Hutchison ( CKHUF ) shares, which jumped 33% the following two days
after the deal was announced in early March, erased all of the
gains by mid-April. But since then it regained lost ground along
with the rise in the broader Hong Kong market index.
The outlook for the deal has been clouded further in recent
days, with a separate source telling Reuters that Chinese ports
operator China Cosco Shipping Corp (COSCO) was also looking to
join the consortium to buy the ports business.
COSCO is requesting veto rights or equivalent power in the
entity that will take over 43 ports from CK Hutchison ( CKHUF ), Bloomberg
News reported this week, citing people familiar with the matter.
COSCO did not respond to a request for comment.
Responding to Reuters' emailed queries on the deal
prospects and possible involvement of COSCO in the consortium, a
White House official said: "As the president said, we didn't
give it to China. We gave it to Panama, and we're taking it
back."
The official did not elaborate.
The existing consortium would likely allow COSCO into the
deal, said Cathy Seifert, an analyst at CFRA Research.
"The bigger risk to the deal being consummated, in my
opinion, is likely the Trump administration, which is likely to
block a deal that would include China," said the New
Jersey-based analyst who tracks BlackRock ( BLK ).
Ballingal Investment Advisors strategist David
Blennerhassett, who publishes on the independent online research
platform Smartkarma, said the addition of COSCO in the
consortium was likely to enrage Trump.
"Trump, who has a handful of issues already on his plate,
would be incandescent," he said.