*
Hedge fund unit has Barclays ( JJCTF ), Citibank debt commitment
letter
*
Says Citgo assets 'deteriorating', urges acceptance of its
bid
By Gary McWilliams
HOUSTON, Oct 21 (Reuters) - Hedge fund Elliott
Investment Management on Monday pressed a court not to hold up
its bid for Citgo Petroleum, saying the Venezuela-owned oil
refiner's assets "are deteriorating in value" and creditors will
not get a better offer from others.
The comments came in a court filing after creditors last
week described an up to $7.3 billion conditional bid placed
before the court by Elliott's wholly-owned Amber Energy as
inadequate and likely to be rejected.
Elliott's wholly-owned Amber Energy repeated its threat to
walk away if the court "does not address threshold issues,"
referring to its desire to hold back more than $2 billion of its
offer as a set-aside were Venezuela bondholders to prevail in a
separate lawsuit. And it wants the court to bar other lawsuits
from seeking control over the same assets.
Citgo operates three U.S. refineries, 38
terminals, six pipelines and supplies fuel to 4,200 independent
retailers. The Houston-based oil refiner is the centerpiece in a
U.S. District Court in Delaware's auction seeking to satisfy $21
billion in claims against Venezuela for defaults and
expropriations.
In addition to Eliott's backing, Amber wrote it has obtained
a debt commitment letter from Barclays ( JJCTF ) and Citigroup ( C/PN )
's Citibank demonstrating its ability to finance the
purchase. It also has retained an eight person refining
management team ready to take over Citgo operations.
The court filing did not address other issues raised by
creditors, including an undisclosed breakup fee should the deal
not conclude, and opposition to other bidders accessing Citgo
financial data until after the court decides on its breakup fee.
A spokesperson declined to respond to those issues.
Amber wrote its proposal is "the best and only realistic
pathway for the largest number of creditors" to receive payment
despite creditors calling its terms as unlikely to provide them
with auction proceeds "for years - if ever."