* Middle East conflict sends jet fuel prices soaring,
disrupts airspace
* Budget airlines most vulnerable to failure, M&A, airline
body chief says
* Slow aircraft, engine deliveries deepening airline woes
* Airline body sticks with net-zero by 2050 target
By Joe Brock
RIO DE JANEIRO, June 6 (Reuters) - Soaring jet fuel prices
driven by conflict in the Middle East are likely to push more
airlines into bankruptcy and spur more sector consolidation this
year and next, the head of the global airline body said on
Saturday.
Global airlines are grappling with higher fuel costs driven
by the U.S. and Israel's war with Iran, which has choked jet
fuel supplies and disrupted key air corridors, forcing costly
detours.
Budget carriers have been among the hardest hit, lacking
higher margin revenue streams such as premium cabins,
high-paying travelers and credit card loyalty programs.
The strain is already showing: U.S. budget airline Spirit
Airlines collapsed last month, and it will not be the last, said
Willie Walsh, director general of the International Air
Transport Association, the industry's main trade body.
"Unfortunately I think there will be some carriers that will
find this high fuel price very difficult to cope with," Walsh
told Reuters at IATA's annual summit in Rio de Janeiro, adding
he expects some airlines to go out of business and others to be
acquired by larger carriers.
Even so, the pressure does not spell the end of the low-cost
airline model, which continues to thrive outside the United
States, where the big three carriers, United Airlines, Delta Air
Lines ( DAL ) and American Airlines ( AAL ), are squeezing out budget
competitors, Walsh said.
"I don't see that the low-cost model is broken, in fact,
quite the opposite," he said, highlighting Ryanair's strong
performance in Europe as an example.
There is one blockbuster deal Walsh does not see happening:
United Airlines CEO Scott Kirby's audacious proposal to buy arch
rival American Airlines ( AAL ) and create a U.S. aviation behemoth. The
idea, which surfaced earlier this year, failed to get done
despite Kirby raising it with President Donald Trump.
"I don't think that's going to happen. I think the
regulatory hurdles would be very significant. I don't know
whether that was a genuine effort to pursue consolidation or
Scott just trying to stir up some media," Walsh said.
MIDDLE EAST AIRLINE WOES
The Iran conflict has upended traffic flows through Middle
Eastern hubs such as Dubai, Doha and Abu Dhabi, creating acute
challenges for Gulf carriers including Emirates, Qatar Airways
and Etihad.
Walsh said he didn't think the conflict would do permanent
damage to the Gulf as an aviation hub given its strategic
geographic importance and the value of the popular Gulf
carriers, which account for 14% of global capacity.
"That capacity cannot be replaced by airlines from other
regions around the world," Walsh said.
"Once things settle down, I would expect the Gulf carriers
to regain their important position in the market."
Adding to the strain is the slow pace of aircraft deliveries
from Boeing ( BA ) and Airbus, along with engine delays from GE
Aerospace and Pratt & Whitney, a unit of RTX, limiting airlines'
ability to expand fleets and improve efficiency.
Walsh said the industry is increasingly frustrated by the
delays, particularly as engine makers post strong profits while
airlines struggle. He estimates supply chain disruption cost
airlines about $11 billion last year.
"We're disappointed that they're not moving faster. We're
disappointed that they're not sharing the pain that the airline
industry is sharing," he said.
Aircraft and engine makers have said that much of the delays
are out of their control, stemming from post-pandemic supply
chain disruptions and political trade disputes.
As airlines come under financial strain and climate policies
lose momentum in the U.S. under Donald Trump, industry leaders
have grown more cautious about meeting a 2050 net zero emissions
target.
Walsh said IATA is not ready to abandon the goal.
"I certainly believe it's more challenging to achieve net
zero in 2050 because we've not made the progress that we had
expected to see on the development of sustainable fuels," he
said.