*
Judge tosses claims over suspicious orders, 'red flags'
*
Claims that company knowingly filled invalid prescriptions
remain
By Brendan Pierson
March 11 (Reuters) - A federal judge on Monday narrowed
the U.S. government's lawsuit accusing Walmart ( WMT ) of fueling the
opioid epidemic, dismissing a claim that the retail giant failed
to report suspicious prescription drug orders to the U.S. Drug
Enforcement Administration (DEA).
Chief U.S. District Judge Colm Connolly in Delaware in the
order also dismissed a claim that Walmart ( WMT ) pharmacists failed to
document "red flags" associated with prescriptions.
However, the judge allowed a claim that pharmacists
dispensed prescriptions that the company's compliance personnel
knew were invalid to go forward.
A fourth claim, that pharmacists dispensed prescriptions
that they themselves knew were invalid, was not part of
Walmart's ( WMT ) motion to dismiss and remains pending.
Walmart ( WMT ) said in a statement that the ruling "reinforces what
we have said all along: the government's lawsuit is misguided
and misapplies the law."
It said the claim allowed by the judge "forces pharmacists
and pharmacies into second-guessing DEA-approved doctors, and to
come between patients and their doctors."
The U.S. Department of Justice declined to comment.
The Justice Department sued Walmart ( WMT ) in December 2020,
accusing the company of repeatedly violating the federal
Controlled Substances Act (CSA) going back to 2013.
It said the company had an obligation under that law to
report suspicious opioid orders received by its wholesale drug
distribution centers to the DEA, but that its procedures for
doing so were inadequate. It said the company failed to report
"at least hundreds of thousands" of such orders.
However, Connolly ruled Monday that the CSA had no such
requirement until it was amended in 2018 to include one
explicitly. Walmart's ( WMT ) wholesale distribution centers stopped
distributing controlled substances earlier that year.
Connolly also found that failure by pharmacists to
investigate and document "red flags," by itself, was not grounds
for liability under the CSA under the text of the law.
The lawsuit is one of the most significant actions by the
federal government against a company over the opioid epidemic.
Other companies targeted by the Justice Department over
opioids include Purdue Pharma, which pleaded guilty to criminal
charges in 2020 over its handling of the addictive painkiller
OxyContin, and drug wholesaler Cencora ( COR ), previously
called AmerisourceBergen.
Walmart ( WMT ) in 2022 settled thousands of lawsuits by state and
local governments over its role in the opioid crisis for $3.1
billion.
Nearly 645,000 people died from opioid overdoses between
1999 and 2021, and preliminary data suggests that the rate has
remained steady at more than 100,000 per year at least through
September 2023, according the U.S. Centers for Disease Control
and Prevention.
The case is United States v. Walmart ( WMT ) et al, U.S. District
Court, District of Delaware, No. 1:20-cv-01744.
For the government: Amanda Liskamm of the U.S. Department of
Justice
For Walmart ( WMT ): Yaakov Roth of Jones Day and others
Read more:
U.S. sues Walmart ( WMT ) accusing retailer of helping to fuel
opioid crisis
OxyContin maker Purdue Pharma pleads guilty to criminal
charges
U.S. sues AmerisourceBergen, says distributor helped ignite
opioid epidemic
CVS, Walmart ( WMT ), Walgreens agree to pay $13.8 bln to settle
U.S. opioid claims