June 18 (Reuters) - A U.S. judge rejected Meta
Platforms' ( META ) bid to dismiss a lawsuit by billionaire
Australian mining magnate Andrew Forrest over scam Facebook
advertisements that show him promoting fake cryptocurrency and
other fraudulent investments.
In a decision on Monday, U.S. District Judge Casey Pitts in
San Jose, California said Australia's second-richest person can
try to prove that Meta's negligence in allowing the ads breached
its duty to operate in a commercially reasonable manner.
Forrest can also try to prove that his name and likeness was
misappropriated by Meta, and not just by fraudsters behind the
bogus ads.
"Dr. Forrest claims that Meta profited more from ads that
included his likeness than it would have if the ads had not,"
Pitts wrote. "This is enough to adequately plead that the
alleged misappropriation was to Meta's advantage."
Lawyers for Meta declined to comment on Tuesday.
The Palo Alto, California-based company had argued that
Section 230 of the federal Communications Decency Act immunized
it from liability as a publisher of third-party content.
But the judge said Forrest's claims "present a factual
dispute regarding whether Meta's ad systems were neutral tools
that anyone could use (or misuse) or whether the tools
themselves contributed to the content of the ads."
Forrest said more than 1,000 of the ads appeared on Facebook
in Australia between April and November 2023, leading to
millions of dollars in losses for victims.
The 62-year-old is executive chairman of iron ore producer
Fortescue Metals Group, and with his family is worth
US$16.5 billion (AUD$24.8 billion), according to Forbes
magazine.
In a statement, Forrest said Pitts' decision was the first
where a social media company was unable to invoke Section 230
immunity in a U.S. civil case over its advertising business.
"This is a crucial strategic victory in the battle to hold
Facebook accountable," he said.
Forrest is seeking compensatory and punitive damages.
In April, Australian prosecutors declined to pursue criminal
charges that he brought against Meta in that country over scam
cryptocurrency ads.
Forrest had sued under Australian laws that let individuals
criminally prosecute foreign companies upon receiving
prosecutors' consent.
The case is Forrest v Facebook Inc et al, U.S. District
Court, Northern District of California, No. 22-03699.