Feb 28 (Reuters) - A U.S. judge has declined to approve
a $27.5 million class action settlement in a consumer lawsuit
accusing Align Technology ( ALGN ), maker of Invisalign clear teeth
aligners, of entering a conspiracy that drove up a rival's
prices.
In a ruling on Thursday, U.S. District Judge Vince Chhabria
in San Francisco said a provision of the settlement providing
coupons for consumers to buy Invisalign products would only
strengthen its position as an alleged monopolist.
"It's not clear that such a settlement would ever be
appropriate in an antitrust class action against a monopolist,"
the judge wrote.
The consumer lawsuit alleged Align conspired with rival
SmileDirectClub to not enter the direct-to-consumer market for
teeth aligners, allowing SmileDirectClub to charge artificially
higher prices.
Align and lawyers for the estimated 1.4 million class
members - consumers who purchased aligners from SmileDirectClub
- did not immediately respond to requests for comment. Align has
denied any wrongdoing, and SmileDirectClub was not a defendant.
SmileDirectClub shut down in December 2023, after filing for
U.S. bankruptcy protection.
Chhabria's ruling was the second time he has denied a
proposed settlement in the lawsuit, filed in 2021. He said the
two sides can try again to persuade him to approve an
alternative settlement.
The judge said in Thursday's order that he was concerned
about a component of the agreement that would give class members
a $300 coupon for Invisalign treatment and $50 in coupons for
one of the company's teeth retainers.
"The defendant in this antitrust case is a monopolist,"
Chhabria wrote. "The proposed settlement includes a coupon
program that will direct still more customers to the
monopolist."
Lawyers for the plaintiffs have defended the coupon
provision. Align told the court this month that the coupons
would "likely have a negligible impact" on the company's sales
and will not harm competition in the aligner industry.
Chhabria set an April 18 hearing to discuss the status of
the case.
The case is Snow v Align Technology Inc ( ALGN ), U.S. District
Court, Northern District of California, No. 3:21-cv-03269-VC.
For plaintiffs: Steve Berman and Rio Pierce of Hagens Berman
Sobol Shapiro
For Align: Karma Giulianelli and Mark Levine of Bartlit
Beck, and James Pearl and Thomas Counts of Paul Hastings
Read more:
Invisalign maker reaches $27.5 million settlement of
consumer antitrust lawsuit