*
Bank accused of short-changing customers out of interest
*
Judge says depositors deserve significantly more relief
*
Capital One not available for comment
By Jonathan Stempel
Nov 7 (Reuters) - A federal judge rejected Capital One's
$425 million settlement with depositors who said they
were cheated out of high interest rates, saying the payout was
too small and millions of account holders would continue to be
short-changed.
The class action settlement was intended to resolve claims
that Capital One froze rates at 0.3% on its "high interest" 360
Savings accounts, while quietly offering rates above 4% to new
customers on similarly named 360 Performance Savings accounts.
Capital One, based in McLean, Virginia, agreed to pay $300
million of unpaid interest to 360 Savings depositors, plus $125
million of interest if they still held their accounts.
But in a decision on Thursday, U.S. District Judge David
Novak in Alexandria, Virginia said the strength of the
plaintiffs' claims justified "significantly greater relief."
JUDGE SAYS HARMS WOULD CONTINUE
The judge said the accord appeared to provide 360 Savings
depositors less than 10% of their damages, and leave them stuck
in the low-yielding accounts while 360 Performance Savings
depositors earned four to eight times more.
"These millions of class members would continue to
experience the same financial harm that they have already
experienced for years," Novak wrote.
The judge ordered both sides to resume settlement
negotiations in order to address his concerns.
Capital One did not immediately respond on Friday to
requests for comment. Philip Black, a lawyer for the plaintiffs,
declined to comment.
NEW YORK, 17 OTHER STATES OPPOSED SETTLEMENT
Eighteen states including New York, which is suing Capital
One over the same issue, opposed the settlement.
They estimated that 360 Savings depositors would earn an
effective 0.78%, compared with 3.4% that 360 Performance Savings
depositors now earn, saving Capital One more than $2.5 billion.
A spokesman for New York Attorney General Letitia James had
no immediate comment.
The U.S. Consumer Financial Protection Bureau also sued
Capital One over the 360 Savings accounts, but dropped the case
as the agency largely ended its enforcement activities.
The case is In re Capital One 360 Savings Account Interest
Rate Litigation, U.S. District Court, Eastern District of
Virginia, No. 24-md-03111.