NEW YORK, Nov 1 (Reuters) - Costs and reliability
concerns related to the burgeoning trend of building
energy-intensive data centers on the sites of U.S. power plants
were the focus of a technical conference held on Friday by the
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission.
As the technology industry races to deploy data centers
needed to roll out technologies like generative artificial
intelligence, quickly accessing the massive amounts of
electricity needed for the centers has become a critical
problem.
Connecting data centers directly to power plants, in an
arrangement known as co-location, has presented a fast way to
access large amounts of electricity, instead of toiling for
years in queues to connect to the broader grid.
"I believe that the federal government, including this
agency, should be doing the very best it can to nurture and
foster their development," said FERC Chairman Willie Phillips,
adding that he considered the AI centers were vital to national
security and the country's economy.
The arrangements have sparked concerns that the co-located
centers will increase power bills for everyday customers by
using grid infrastructure and services paid for by the public.
Co-located data centers have also raised reliability questions,
in part, by diverting steady power from the grid or potentially
sucking electricity from the system if the neighboring power
plant goes down.
"Does the customer get to still draw power from the grid?
Because if it does, that's going to have a huge impact," said
Commissioner Mark Christie.
The technical conference could lead to new guidelines for
who is responsible for certain costs related to co-located data
centers and how the centers are governed.
FERC is also currently gathering details on a regulatory
battle being waged by electric utilities over a co-located
Amazon data center at a Talen Energy ( TLN ) nuclear power plant in
Pennsylvania. Talen's interconnection agreement for the center
is being opposed by utilities Exelon ( EXC ) and American Electric
power ( AEP ), and FERC's decision could set a precedent for similar
deals.