*
Lawmakers question Musk's influence in Golden Dome bidding
process
*
Concerns over SpaceX's proposed subscription model for
missile
defense
*
Pentagon reviewing lawmakers' request for investigation
into
Musk's role
By Marisa Taylor, Mike Stone
WASHINGTON, May 1 (Reuters) - A group of 42 Democratic
lawmakers has called for a review of Elon Musk's role in the
bidding process for the "Golden Dome" missile defense shield, a
project championed by President Donald Trump.
In a letter dated May 1 and sent to the acting US Defense
Department Inspector General seen by Reuters, the group, led by
Senator Elizabeth Warren and congressman Greg Casar, requested a
probe into the origins of the procurement process, citing
concerns over the involvement of Elon Musk's SpaceX.
The lawmakers' move comes after a Reuters report revealed that
SpaceX, along with Palantir ( PLTR ) and Anduril, had emerged as
frontrunners to win a crucial part of the Golden Dome project,
which aims to build a network of satellites to detect and track
incoming missiles to the U.S. The report also highlighted the
close ties between Musk and the Trump administration, with Musk
serving as a special adviser to the president and donating over
$250 million to help elect him.
"This is a deeply troubling report," the lawmakers wrote in
their letter. "All of this raises concerns about whether defense
contracts to build a Golden Dome are an effective way to protect
Americans or are meant to enrich Mr. Musk and other elites."
If the inspector general finds Musk has played a role in his
company gaining an edge in the process, the lawmakers requested
the inspector general refer any findings to the Justice
Department for a criminal investigation. The letter does not
guarantee a review will be initiated.
The Pentagon's Inspector General's office said they had
received the letter and were reviewing it.
The group of lawmakers also expressed concerns over the
potential for a "subscription service" proposed by SpaceX, which
could allow the company to skirt traditional Pentagon
procurement protocols and limit government control over the
system's development and pricing.
"A subscription model would also give Mr. Musk unacceptable
ongoing leverage over United States national security," they
wrote.
SpaceX, where billionaire Musk is CEO, did not immediately
respond to a request for comment on the letter. It did not
respond to questions about its role in Golden Dome in the
original Reuters story. After publication, Musk replied to a
post about it on his social network X without elaborating: "This
is not true."
The Pentagon did not immediately respond to a request for
comment on the letter. In the original Reuters story, it said it
will deliver "options to the President for his decision in line
with the executive order and in alignment with White House
guidance and timelines."
Palantir ( PLTR ) and Anduril did not immediately respond to requests
for comment.
Despite the Pentagon's positive signals to the SpaceX group,
some sources have stressed the decision process for Golden Dome
is in its early stages. Its ultimate structure and who is
selected to work on it could change dramatically in the coming
months.
The Golden Dome project has been met with skepticism by some
military experts, who question its feasibility and potential
effectiveness.
The Pentagon has received interest from over 180 companies
to develop and build the Golden Dome, with traditional defense
contractors such as Northrop Grumman ( NOC ), Boeing ( BA ), and
Lockheed Martin ( LMT ) also vying for a role in the project.
The timing of the lawmakers' request is particularly
significant, as last week Reuters reported that the Senate
version of the upcoming reconciliation budget package earmarks
$27 billion for the Golden Dome project, a significant
investment that could pave the way for its implementation.
The lawmakers' request for an inquiry follows concerns raised by
other Democrats in Congress over Musk's influence on federal
contracts while serving in the White House. Senator Jeanne
Shaheen has introduced legislation to prevent federal contracts
from being issued to companies owned by special advisers like
Musk.