Oct 22 (Reuters) - Meta Platforms ( META ) and Chief
Executive Mark Zuckerberg won the dismissal of a lawsuit
claiming they misled shareholders in Meta's proxy statement
about their ability to ensure the safety of children who use
Facebook and Instagram.
In a decision on Tuesday, U.S. District Judge Charles Breyer
in San Francisco said the plaintiff Matt Eisner failed to show
that shareholders suffered economic losses from Meta's alleged
inadequate disclosures.
He also said federal securities law did not require Meta to
detail the severity of sexually explicit content and sexual
exploitation of children on its platforms, or all the child
protection strategies it decided not to adopt.
"In essence, Eisner would have had Meta argue against its
own recommendations, tout the benefits of tools it ultimately
rejected, highlight its own failures, and devalue its own
successes," Breyer wrote. "That is not necessary."
Eisner's lawyers did not immediately respond to requests for
comment. Lawyers for Meta and Zuckerberg did not immediately
respond to similar requests.
The lawsuit sought to block Meta from holding its 2024
annual meeting until the proxy statement was amended, void
election results if the meeting were held, and have Meta and
Zuckerberg cover Eisner's legal fees and costs.
Breyer had in June refused to enjoin the meeting, saying
many of Meta's assurances in the proxy statement that it was
committed to children's safety were simply "aspirational" and
did not justify the lawsuit.
Tuesday's dismissal was with prejudice, meaning Eisner
cannot sue Meta and Zuckerberg again.
Meta still faces lawsuits by dozens of state attorneys
general accusing the Menlo Park, California-based company of
addicting children to its apps while downplaying the risks.
It also faces hundreds of lawsuits by children, their
parents and school districts over social media addiction. The
operators of TikTok, Snapchat and other apps face hundreds of
similar lawsuits of their own.
The case is Eisner v Meta Platforms Inc ( META ) et al, U.S. District
Court, Northern District of California, No. 24-02175.